Don Edler: Devil You Know

Don Edler: Devil You Know
January 10 - 24, 2021

Hunter Shaw Fine Art is pleased to present Devil You Know (2020) by Don Edler, the artist’s second feature-length video. Devil You Know will be screening on www.huntershawfineart.com January 10 - 24, 2021. Through a hybrid of political satire, experimental documentary, and speculative horror, Devil You Know reflects the dangerous absurdity of the contemporary American media environment. Equal parts video essay, staged interviews, and found footage collage, Devil You Know highlights the inherent biases underlying the aesthetics of credibility - and the credibility of aesthetics - in the post-truth media landscape. 

Devil You Know is based on a script Edler co-wrote with GPT-3, an advanced deep learning-based language model developed by OpenAI. Popularly referred to as “Artificial Intelligence”, GPT-3 is known for it’s uncanny ability to generate believable natural language. To develop the shooting script, Edler fed the model prompts and content derived from an extended period of immersive research into the highly-biased information environments of radical online political spaces. This experiment was intended to exploit some of the biases within the AI’s knowledgebase in order to identify and extrapolate underlying normative, ideological qualities within the extreme input text. As a result of this process, the generated script, and ultimately the video itself both reflect the hypermediated ideological macro-culture of American Capitalism. While GPT-3 does not have a political agenda per se, it has assimilated the biases of the vast datasets on which it was trained. One example of this is the anti-Russian sentiment prevalent in the texts generated by the AI. Edler did not explicitly or implicitly direct this sentiment, but it’s repeated appearance suggests that Russophobia may be a dominant bias in the datasets GPT-3 learned from. In Edler’s experiment, the extreme input returned language that was passionate and politically charged in rhetoric, yet ambiguous in position and elusive in meaning: the type of pseudo-intellectual word salad that would not be out of place on AM talk radio, in a DIY conspiracy theory documentary, or an overly-complex press release.  

The GPT-3 texts were adapted to screenplay format and interpreted by professional actors and Amazon Polly text-to-voice speech synthesis. These performances expose the presumed credibility of “nonfiction” aesthetics. Sampling from a wide variety of formal tropes, Edler investigates the authority and validity ascribed to nonfiction archetypes such as the bespectacled expert, the YouTube influencer poet, the corporate news anchor, and the posh-accented voiceover. These representations are further complicated by the influence of race, gender, class, affect, and character upon the messaging and politics of images, articulated here through Edler’s casting and art direction, and equally through the stylistic choices of the performers. 

Devil You Know declares its own artifice from the first frame and repeatedly reminds the viewer that they are watching a performance - or more precisely - a document of a performance. There is no solid footing here. Edler drops the viewer into a disorienting freefall through unreliable narrators and unreliable perspectives cloaked in the semiotics of authority. The subjectivity of image is further exploited through the video’s stylized editing and graphic layering of text and image. These elements come together to create an overall meta-narrative around contemporary time-based media, and the structural factors that influence how it functions in the mind of the viewer. This shifting kaleidoscope of fractured subjectivities is ultimately incoherent, creating a cognitive dissonance which grows in magnitude as the video unfolds. Eventually this distrust crystalizes into a lens through which the viewer may examine their own subjectivities, biases, and worldviews continually throughout the process of viewing the work. 

Devil You Know delivers a potent form of psychological horror through its subversive play with verisimilitude. The inclusion of several “deepfake” videos casts a shadow of doubt over the entire work, and point to deeper, more sinister fabrications: the manufacture of consent which permeates our culture at every level, assisted by the machinery of technocapitalism. The video comes to a crescendo in a sequence narrated by Amazon Polly, explaining pareidolia - “the tendency for incorrect perception of a stimulus as an object, pattern or meaning known to the observer, such as seeing shapes in clouds, seeing faces in inanimate objects or abstract patterns, or hearing hidden messages in music.” At this point the viewer may recognize how the video itself has engaged their own pareidolic tendencies, seeking patterns within the chaos presented thus far. Devil You Know is a shattered reflection of ideology - myriad adjacent fragments none of which, nor the sum of which, produce an accurate representation of the whole. The effect is both chilling and absurd as information becomes abstracted and the lines between fact, fiction, opinion and propaganda are blurred, distorted or erased entirely, leaving the viewer to question their own biases, and the credibility of their  influences.

Don Edler was born in Bremen, Germany and lives and works in Los Angeles, CA. Edler attended the Skowhegan School of Painting and Sculpture, and received an MFA in Studio Art from New York University, as well as a BFA in Sculpture from University of Florida. Recent solo and two person exhibitions include Two Minutes To Midnight, Hunter Shaw Fine Art, Los Angeles (2019); 6871 California Ave, Five Car Garage, Los Angeles (2018); The Father The Sun and The Holy Road, San Diego Art Institute, San Diego CA (2016); COBRA DESTROYER, Central Park Gallery, Los Angeles CA (2016). Recent group exhibitions include XX:XX, Hunter Shaw Fine Art, Los Angeles (2020); Ecoshamanism curated by Ian James, Leroy’s Happy Place, Los Angeles CA (2018); Mile To Mile, Roger’s Office, Los Angeles CA (2018); To Have or To Be, Ochi Projects, Los Angeles CA (2018); Corpus Alienum, Hunter Shaw Fine Art, Los Angeles CA (2017); The Useful and The Decorative, The Landing, Los Angeles CA (2017); Memory Room curated by Andrew Ross, Outpost Artist Resources, Queens, NY (2016). Don Edler is also the founder and curator of ELEVATOR MONDAYS, a social exhibition space in Los Angeles founded in 2017.

Suzan Pitt: Joy Street

Suzan Pitt
Joy Street

Opening reception:
Sunday March 31, 4-7pm

On view:
March 31 - May 5 2019

5513 W Pico Blvd. Los Angeles CA 90019

SuzanPitt_RA_11_LG.jpg

Hunter Shaw Fine Art is pleased to announce Suzan Pitt : Joy Street. The exhibition will feature a continual loop of the artist’s hand-painted animation masterpiece Joy Street (1995), presented here in a newly-produced archival edition, alongside a selection of related works on paper. Battling a period of depression in the late 1980s, Suzan Pitt utilized a Fulbright Grant to visit the remote, unspoiled rainforests of Central America, painting the region’s vibrant biodiversity and healing emotionally through immersion in nature. Trekking deep within the tropical forests of Mexico and Guatemala, Pitt worked en plein air from her inflatable kayak, producing a series of intimate and expressive watercolors of the virgin jungle, exhibited here for the first time. This regenerative experience directly inspired Joy Street, and over the next five years the artist painstakingly animated what would become a profound story of spiritual renewal through contact with nature - within the film’s narrative and her own life.

Suzan Pitt painting the jungle of Río Sarstún, Guatemala, 1989

Suzan Pitt painting the jungle of Río Sarstún, Guatemala, 1989

Ironically, Joy Street begins in despair. Set to the downtrodden chords of a ragged and forlorn jazz melody, the film’s opening sequence introduces a suicidally depressed woman suffering conditions of urban isolation and emotional torment. Drinking and smoking alone in her drab, cavernous apartment, her melancholy festers into agony. Eventually, she passes out after a disturbing scene of self-harm with a cactus. At this point, the film undergoes a series of sudden mood swings when a cartoon mouse on a ceramic ashtray comes alive in the next room. Charged with bright optimism, the colorful, happy-go-lucky spirit comically dances and flops around, enlivening the bleak apartment. Accidentally stumbling upon the unconscious and bleeding woman, the mouse becomes fearful and cries for her. The dreadful atmosphere of the bedroom mutates into a vision of fetid waters polluted with human and animal corpses, broken and bloodied trees. In response to the terrible vision, the mouse carries the woman’s body to a nearby park, which magically transforms into a tropical forest bursting with life. The woman is brought to her senses by a dazzling, joyous ballet of howler monkeys, flirtatious butterflies, and hungry ants harmoniously enjoying the dense, vibrant jungle. This visually delicious sequence ends with a meditative ape delicately sniffing a rose, his eyes rolling back in peaceful pleasure over and over. When the woman awakens, back in her bed, she grins fondly as the cartoon mouse fades from view - his work complete, her spirit and consciousness restored. With effort, she pries open her dirty bedroom window, letting in sunshine and bird songs on the morning breeze  - a newfound curiosity for the outside world visible on her smiling face.

Joy Street is a tremendous achievement of visual and musical storytelling. Accentuated by a brilliantly versatile score from Roy Nathanson’s Jazz Passengers featuring Debbie Harry, the film’s music and imagery deftly convey complex content without the use of dialog or text. Free from language, its message is universally accessible. Throughout the film, Pitt’s formal decisions regarding materials, style and color clearly communicate the emotional and intellectual qualities of the story. The woman and her world are rendered in a harsh, sickly manner reminiscent of the extreme angles, foreboding architecture, and romanticized dread of German Expressionism. The arrival of the mouse brings in a colorful, zany animism. The world becomes infused with spirit and character: the radio grins as the wood grain on a shelf turns into a flowing, flowering stream. On a deeper level, the ashtray mouse is in fact a talisman or fetish - a manmade object imbued with magical qualities, in this case the innocence and creativity of nature. The mouse represents the animist worldview of early cartoons in which objects, buildings and landscapes wriggle and pulsate with life, and is therefore a spiritual conduit for the woman to reconnect with nature.

Joy_Street_still_3_300dpi.jpg

In a 2008 statement on Joy Street, Pitt speaks to her inspiration for the dynamic between the depressed woman and her exuberant shamanic guide: “My son had given me a tiny ceramic ashtray, probably from the 1940s, with a little generic mouse sitting on it. I thought about how there must be something very pure in the essence of life - uncorrupted - existing in pure color, like the colors of the mouse and the innocence of the childlike nature of the cartoon. We were all becoming aware in the 90s of how we have polluted the earth and how nature has fallen to our greed and exploitation. I made the storyboard very simply about two opposites - the woman who is depressed, neurotic and spiritually bankrupt and the cartoon mouse. One forever hopeful and creative and the other mired in a sense of futility. So the film is about manic depression in one way, and in another way it is about our need to apply creative and passionate thinking to the dilemma of the natural world.”

Nearly twenty-five years since its release, Joy Street’s message of compassion towards other beings is now more urgent than ever. Widely regarded as a classic of independent animation, Joy Street is an artwork of world-class execution and worldwide significance. It is truly the work of an auteur and undoubtedly the magnum opus of Suzan Pitt’s distinguished career. 

Suzan Pitt was born in Kansas City in 1943. In 1965, she received a BFA in painting from Cranbrook Academy of Art. Her film Asparagus premiered in an installation at the Whitney Museum of American Art in 1979, and was paired for two years with David Lynch’s ERASERHEAD in the notorious midnight shows at the Waverly Theater in New York City and the NuArt in Los Angeles. A retrospective of Suzan Pitt’s prize-winning animated films was presented in 2017 at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. One person exhibitions of her paintings have been presented at The Ginza Art Space in Tokyo, The Whitney Museum of American Art, Holly Solomon Gallery NY, Cantor-Lemberg Gallery Detroit, Hans Mayer Gallery Dusseldorf, and the Delahunty Gallery NY amongst many others. Her paintings and films are in the permanent collections of the Walker Art Center, The Museum of Modern Art, The Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Los Angeles. Her animated films have been featured at hundreds of prestigious venues around the world, including the Sundance Film Festival, The New York Film Festival, The London Film Festival, the Ottawa International Animated Film Festival, Morelia International Film Festival, and the Image Forum Film Festival in Tokyo. The artist now lives and and works in Taos, NM.

Suzan Pitt with Keith Haring, wearing jackets painted by Suzan, NYC, 1980s

Suzan Pitt with Keith Haring, wearing jackets painted by Suzan, NYC, 1980s

Meet The Monster • OPAF 2019

Meet The Monster
Jamie Fletcher
Ian Hokin
R. Lord
Jonny Negron

March 16 + 17

Other Places Art Fair

Battery Leary-Merriam
Angels Gate Park
3601 S Gaffey St. San Pedro CA 90731

lord7_2_orig_crop.jpeg

Hunter Shaw Fine Art presents Meet The Monster, a site-specific presentation of works by Jamie Fletcher, Ian Hokin, R. Lord, and Jonny Negron. Responding to the bizarre history of Battery Leary-Merriam, the location of Other Places Art Fair, and more famously, the so-called “Battle of Los Angeles,” Meet The Monster examines the role of the human mind in fabricating our fears and desires. The mind is both repository and breeding ground of information, misinformation, imagination, addiction, prejudice, and preference; this exhibition explores how these influences conspire to construct our subjective experience of consensus reality.

On the night of February 25 1942, citizens of greater Los Angeles were alarmed by reports of a “mystery invader” in the skies - an unidentified flying object had apparently breached the city’s airspace. With Pearl Harbor having taken place only two months prior, and wartime paranoia at an all time high, the military responded by calling an immediate citywide blackout, and lighting up the skies with convergent spotlight beams and an enthusiastic barrage from the anti-aircraft guns at Battery Leary-Merriam. Mysteriously, no wreckage was ever recovered although the skyward offensive lasted for over an-hour. Civilian reports of the incident ranged from mundane to fantastical, although everyone agreed the army had certainly fired at… something. Whatever the case, the “Battle of Los Angeles” captured the imagination not only of San Pedro residents - where a yearly re-creation of the event is staged - but also of a more widespread, conspiracy-minded community interested in uncovering a connection between extraterrestrials and the Military Industrial Complex

This line of thinking is explored in a series of small canvases by R. Lord, depicting the domestic life of an extraterrestrial family and their human pet, amongst other darkly comic, conspiracy-laden images. Across this body of work, the narrative is appropriately loose, associations relying on a feedback loop of niche information, cognitive gymnastics and near-rhyme relationships. In Little Blue Book (all works 2017), a flying saucer erases the text of the Bible and replaces it with information about NASA, conflating the Christian holy book with Project Blue Book (the notorious top-secret study of UFOs conducted by the United States Air Air Force, which has served as conspiracy theory jet fuel for decades.)

Hell (2013) by Jonny Negron plumbs a darker vein of nightmarish military conspiracy. The dense and cinematic drawing envisions the infernal torture of a POW at the hands of an ancient and demonic Nazi. In the foreground a laptop displaying lusty jpgs - perhaps some kind of evidence - is lost to the flames, while in the background, a figure absconds, youthful pigtails disappearing behind a wall of fire. This associative dread is stripped to its innermost elements in Negron’s Portishead (2012), a dystopian Narcissus in tight close-up. Enraptured by its own image, a figure intensely locks eyes with its reflection, the the tip of its nose hovering centimeters above a black puddle polluted with electronic waste. Rendered in the stark negative space of the raw page, the subject is detached from its environment, isolated by ego and mind.

The isolated mind is in fact the central focus in the practice of Ian Hokin, whose paintings are based upon visions he receives while floating in a sensory-deprivation tank. Free from external stimulation, the artist can sink through his own subconscious, and dive more deeply into the ocean of collective unconscious. From this realm emerge archetypal forces and primordial energies, which - like dreams - materialize in forms specific to the subconscious of the person perceiving them. For example, if the monster represents a primordial fear of the unknown, the mind creates the image of the monster, giving it a form culturally recognizable to the individual imagining it. Working with this symbolic visual language, Hokin’s paintings create an open system between creator, image and audience, where interpretation and meaning vibrate between familiar and foreign, euphoric and terrifying.

Jamie Fletcher also examines how complex mental states are materialized into subjective experience. Investigating the psychology of BDSM, Fletcher’s work explores the emotional and experiential ambivalence of consensual submission or domination, in which a participant may feel simultaneous arousal and humiliation, or pleasure and pain. Executed with a spare and expressive hand in bleach on black canvas, a pair of untitled paintings depict these hybrid states. In Untitled 1 (2013), a figure dripping in fluids stares directly at the viewer, a smug expression visible under a skin-tight mask. In the companion piece, a wild-eyed, messy-haired figure bares its teeth around a ball gag, its face urgent and intoxicated. Both images depict the manifestation of mindset, in which inner fears and desires are materialized through the experience of submission.

Although BDSM is an extreme example, our minds are constantly producing a self-image and worldview based on our fears and desires, while in turn projecting and experiencing a subjective version of consensus reality. What is projected influences what is experienced. Multiple viewers of the same incident may report drastically different interpretations based on the preferences they project. For nearly 80 years, the inconclusive and contradictory information surrounding the “Battle of Los Angeles” has fueled many Americans’ obsession with extraterrestrials, shaping their worldview, and undoubtedly influencing culture and politics from the Cold War to the present. Recent investigations into the “Battle of Los Angeles” suggest that there was, in fact, no invading aircraft, and that the military had actually orchestrated the event as a show of force to dazzle citizens and frighten any foreign enemies lurking off the coast. They had fired at nothing and the extraterrestrial rumors that followed were just icing on the cake. Setting the tone for Atom Age fears and speculations, Aliens became the latest manifestation of fear of the unknown. For many decades now, the military has allowed rumors and misinformation to guide the public’s perception of its activities, especially for those connecting the dots from San Pedro to Roswell to Area 51 and beyond. For the military, electing not to disprove or comment on these topics has the benefit of further obfuscating the truth about their enterprises, allowing the public’s imagination to produce erroneous conclusions which are never confirmed nor denied.